Translate
Monday, January 18, 2021
An unpopular possible scenario nobody in Patriots media is willing to take on.
Sunday, January 17, 2021
Pass Catchers Will Have A Down Year, If The Patriots Don't Improve Thier Quarterback And Offensive Positional Coachs.
Thursday, January 14, 2021
Stop making excuses for Cam Newton, he had more than a fair shake.
For all the reasons to re-sign Cam Newton, all the pros don't outweight the fact that Cam Newton doesn't get the ball to pass catchers. From poor decision making to vision, to the fact he cannot throw to them. Newton threw to his pass catchers' bubbles and also was throwing grounders to open pass catchers or sailing it over their heads.
Cam played with basement weapons but he didn't look like a top 32 quarterback, not did he look like a top 24 quarterback. Newton had someplace between the 27th and 29th pass catching unit. Depending on which ranking you went with majority of the rankings had Newton 27 to 32 starter in the league. In rare cases, some writers put Cam in the top 13 for click bait.
I did an article looking at Newton's accuracy and talking about how analysts said the tapes showed individual pass catchers were getting open a handful of times a game and he wouldn't see or would ignore them and that although he had a higher than normal completion percentage, that his completions were still inaccurate and that hurt pass catchers' development.
In that article I also looked at the catch and true catch rates of his receivers and tight ends. Good quarterbacks can elevate bad pass catchers and good pass catchers can elevate bad quarterbacks. Although the Patriots pass catchers struggled to get separation, it really looked like they elevated Cam.
Now don't get me wrong, bad players can also hurt good players. Newton failing to see or get the ball to open pass catchers hurt them and the team even more than the lack of separation hurt Newton.
Newton started 15 games and was one of the worst quarterbacks if not the worst starter for all 32 teams, in fact he might not even of been the 32nd best quarterback but people are saying that's not a fair chance. So if a season as starter is not a fair chance, what is? Three seasons, five seasons, a decade? 15 games is more than a fair chance when you're the starter.
Newton sucked as a passer and people cannot admit it. They blame everyone but him. At least 50% of the Patriots passing game struggles was from Newton's flaws.
He can run the ball but he cannot throw the ball anymore, at least not consistently. When running the ball, Newton looked slow and his option runs were too slow from his making his decision.
People are quick to point out week one where he beat up on a Dolphins, a team that couldn't stop the option play, and week two against a Seahawks team, that couldn't rush the quarterback or cover receivers. Week three Cam started to digress. In fact Newton's week three first half versus the Raiders, looked no different than Stidham's week four fourth quarter against the Chiefs.
In fact from everything we saw, They will get the same production in the passing game from Stidham, as the two were comparable all season. Difference being Newton will now be an eleven year veteran and Stidham a third year player.
Plus Stidham's rookie contract will be much cheaper than Cam Newton's veteran minimum. So the question begs to be asked, is Newton's running ability worth his contract and inability to pass?
Newton was a high risk, high reward player on a lowball deal in 2020. That risk will be even greater in 2021, as he will of aged several months. Months may not seem like a lot but we have seen players in all sports drop off in the short span between seasons.
Father time always wins. Newton is supposed to be a quarterback but he's always been an inconsistent passer at best, who relies on his legs. Thus instead of grading him on a quarterback scale where 35-36 is old, we must grade him on a running back scale. Old for running backs is 30. Newton's currently 31. Thus he should be done by 35, not 40. That's a huge difference.
Don't get me wrong, I am not saying Stidham is the answer for 2021 but he could be a one season bridge quarterback or worthy of a back spot.
Plus there have been arguements that Newton didn't have a full offseason, preseason, or weapons, and that any quarterback would've been bad in that situation. Well although Stidham was under contract, he didn't have any of that either and didn't benefit from first team reps in 2020 like Newton did. His scout team reps running opponents playbooks made him just as unprepared to run the Patriots offense as Newton's limited knowledge of it.
I am okay with the Patriots bringing in another quarterback to start. I am okay with them drafting a quarterback. Unless the Patriots cannot get a good option in either the draft or free agency, I cannot see how Newton's running ability makes up for his inability to pass or his contract. I trust Belichick and the name on the front will always mean more than the name on the back. For Cam Newton fans, I wonder how many that is true for as it seems they're putting Newton above the best interests of the team.
Wednesday, January 13, 2021
Fitzmagic In New England?
The Patriots May Have Been Blindsided By Brady Leaving
Jerry Trotta wrote a piece saying the Patriots kept Thuney for Brady. If the Patriots really did tag Joe Thuney to keep Brady happy, it shows just how much Brady screwed them by leaving.
Trotta quoted Mike Giardi of tweeting, "Thuney was surprisingly franchised tagged last winter - at least that's how the league felt - but there are those within the Pats that believed it was a show of faith for Tom Brady and his possible return. Brady instead chose Tampa and the Pats had a 15 million $$ Guard."
There were a slew of things that pointed to Brady leaving, from the way his contract got reworked in the preseason, to him putting his house up, to him stepping down from a Boston charity. So either the team was naive or Brady did a really good job of playing everything down.
Don't get me wrong, Thuney is a great player but let's be honest, the team had serious needs and could've tried to find a stand in, while signing one or two other players that fit urgent needs.
Here's a scenario that could've been a real possibility. The Patriots could've brought in a guard for 6 million and brought in Andy Dalton, who was a better fit for the team for around 8 million. Dalton took a backup role but would've taken a starting job for around that amount on a one year deal. That would've been all for what they paid Thuney.
Instead the team signed Cam Newton for next to nothing and with looking at how they ran their offense, even with how they modified the run game; they still wanted a pocket passer. Their offense clashed with Newton's abilities as a quarterback. Although to be honest, with how bad of a passer Newton is, any offense clashes with Newton's abilities to play the position except the college team Navy.
Trotta finished with the following statement and it's so true that I'm gonna let his closing words finish my article but it appears Brady did a bigger job of sticking it to the Patriots than fans realized.
"We’re not sure who was behind that thought process, but if this report is true, it certainly isn’t the best look. Nonetheless, it’s just so fitting that Brady’s free agency reportedly played a role in one of the Patriots’ most confounding roster moves in recent memory," said Jerry Trotta.
Trotta's article:
https://musketfire.com/2021/01/12/patriots-stuck-joe-thuney-tom-brady/
Tuesday, January 12, 2021
The Quarterbacks were the problem with the Patriots tight end core.
I can't speak for all three but of those 7 passes thrown to izzo, many of them were high or wide with no chance for him to catch them with him being open.
All three had small periods where they were open and the ball would not even go their direction. That hurt all three of their production and development.
Ryan Izzo 70% catchable passes 92.9 true catch rate.
Devin Asiasi 86.7% - 33.3%, Keene 80% -75%
All the pass catchers would get open only a handful of times a game and the tape showed majority of those times the pass catchers weren't getting the ball. Thus, these stats should be better.
I believe all three tight ends would be better with a more accurate quarterback who has better decision making skills.
When it comes to the quarterback play, I will say this. Every one of Stidham's performances were comparable to what we were seeing from Newton. So if the Patriots cannot find a veteran or draft a quarterback, they might as well just go with Stidham instead of bringing back Newton.
Give Stidham a full offseason as a starter with full starter reps, plus better weapons and you'll see just as much improvement as you would from Cam getting it, only Newton will cost more. Save the money and roll it into 2022.
One thing we know from watching Cam is he's not the guy. Yeah, he went 7-9 but his inconsistent play costed the team games. He's flaws hurt having him on the team as a bridge quarterback, regardless of how much his legs are an asset.
Now, don't get me wrong. Stidham showed to me as a passer that he's almost as bad as Newton but the financial aspect says it's smarter to run with him if the only option is Cam.